Westminster City Council King Street Low Carbon Trial - Client Report

First page Table of contents Next page Last page

Executive Summary	3
Introduction	5
Background	6
Scope	7
Limitations	7
Aims & Objectives	7
Scheme Details	8
Baseline	13
Comparison between King Street & Marlborough Hill	13
Plant	17
Materials	18
Transportation	20
Suppliers	22
Marketing Campaign	24 - 25
Results	28
Embodied Carbon	34
Overall Carbon Usage	36
Other Environmental Benefits	37
Site Feedback	38
Testimonials	39
Financial Impact	41
Conclusion	48
Recommendations	51
Article – Highways magazine	54
Article – Asphalt Now	55
Article – Asphalt Industry Alliance	56
Article – NLA.london	57
Article – uk.100	58
Figure 1 - General Arrangement Drawing for King Street	10 - 11
Figure 2 - Shows the differences between the two schemes.	13
Figure 3 - General Arrangement Drawing for Marlborough Hill	14 - 15
Figure 4 - The JCB excavator in action on King Street	17
Figure 5 - Demonstrates the sustainable products and plant used	20
Figure 6 - Electric Van	21
Figure 7 - Speedy Hire Electric Taxi Delivery Vehicle	22
Figure 8 - Graph Showing the Comparison of Operational Carbon Produced on King Street & Marlborough Hill	29
Figure 9 - Pie Charts Showing the Carbon Produced by Type Across Both Schemes	30
Figure 10 - Graph Showing the Carbon Breakdown Across All Operations	32 - 33
Figure 11 - Bar Chart Showing the Total Carbon Footprint at both sites	34
Figure 12 - Graph showing how the embodied carbon is broken down	35
Figure 13 - Table showing the whole tCO2e carbon footprint for both schemes:	36
Figure 14 - Table showing the King Street carbon savings	36
Figure 15 - The table below shows the approximate costs of the extraordinary items	43
Figure 16 - Stacked Graph showing the additional costs against the scheme estimate	44

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog