Westminster City Council King Street Low Carbon Trial - Client Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3 5 6 7 7 7 8 11 11

Executive Summary

Introduction Background

Scope

Limitations

Aims & Objectives Scheme Details

Baseline

Comparison between King Street & Marlborough Hill

14 15 17 19

Plant

Materials

Transportation

Suppliers

20 23 27 29 30

Marketing Campaign

Results

Embodied Carbon Overall Carbon Usage

Other Environmental Benefits

31

Site Feedback Testimonials Financial Impact

32 34

41

Conclusion

44

Recommendations

46 47 48 49 50

Article – Highways magazine

Article – Asphalt Now

Article – Asphalt Industry Alliance

Article – NLA.london

Article – uk.100

TABLES & GRAPHS

9 11

Figure 1 - General Arrangement Drawing for King Street Figure 2 - Shows the differences between the two schemes. Figure 3 - General Arrangement Drawing for Marlborough Hill Figure 4 - The JCB excavator in action on King Street Figure 5 - Demonstrates the sustainable products and plant used

12 14 17 18 19

Figure 6 - Electric Van

Figure 7 - Speedy Hire Electric Taxi Delivery Vehicle

24 Figure 8 - Graph Showing the Comparison of Operational Carbon Produced on King Street & Marlborough Hill 25 Figure 9 - Pie Charts Showing the Carbon Produced by Type Across Both Schemes 26 Figure 10 - Graph Showing the Carbon Breakdown Across All Operations 27 Figure 11 - Bar Chart Showing the Total Carbon Footprint at both sites 28 Figure 12 - Graph showing how the embodied carbon is broken down 29 Figure 13 - Table showing the whole tCO2e carbon footprint for both schemes: 29 Figure 14 - Table showing the King Street carbon savings 36 Figure 15 - The table below shows the approximate costs of the extraordinary items 37 Figure 16 - Stacked Graph showing the additional costs against the scheme estimate

2