Westminster City Council King Street Low Carbon Trial - Client Report

The carbon for operations was negligible at just 0.02t for the whole scheme, which was because all the plant was electric.

Travel also saw a large reduction of over 70% as all staff and visitors could only come to site by walking or cycling if they were close, public transport or electric vehicles.

Whereas the deliveries accounted for 1.23t which was a 60% saving against Marlborough Hill since most vehicles were fuelled by HVO instead of diesel. However, we have still assumed that HVO has a carbon footprint 50% of diesel.

The total carbon used on both King Street and Marlborough Hill is shown in the table on page 25:

Figure 8 - Graph Showing the Comparison of Operational Carbon Produced on King Street & Marlborough Hill

KING ST V MARLBOROUGH HILL OPERATIONAL CARBON PRODUCED BY TONNAGE

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Total

Travel

Deliveries

Operations

Marlborough Hill

King Street

The above graph shows the total carbon savings made on King Street compared to Marlborough Hill. The breakdown shows 76% saving on travel (0.01t per day), 60% on deliveries (0.03t per day), 97% saving on operations (0.0005t per day).

24